Not a novel, which ... well ... some of the events described in the book would stretch credulity in fiction. It's a book about the lies we tell ourselves about the criminal justice system, and it kinda indirectly raises some of the questions some of the novels I've read the past few months have, about true crime as entertainment--I think this book is less opposed to it than some of those novels, just more skeptical about the magic of forensic science. The upshot: Judges should not be the ones deciding what scientific (or "scientific") evidence is admissible--they are, as it happens, really bad at it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Mary by Nat Cassidy
This is not a particularly bad novel, but it's not really a very good one, either. There's a blurb on the back that compares the m...
-
This is a deeply romantic series of adventures in the pursuit of solving a mystery. There are references to Doyle, it's possible the aut...
-
I dunno. On the one hand there are some interesting ideas in this novel, and Cantero's prose sparkles with wit and joy. On the other h...
-
So, this was a book that I almost stopped reading a couple-three times. It's not *bad*, exactly, but it's a weird dissonant tonal ...

No comments:
Post a Comment