The tone of this novel is ... really, really weird. It's set ... less than a century in the future, in a time when all sorts of environmental crises have gotten much worse, but when there are people who are clear on what needs to be done and determined to do it: The world is much worse, but people seem somehow better, at least the POV and (most of) the people he cares about. Of course, there are obvious bad people who for whatever reason/s would rather just see everything burn, at least so long as they and their stuff are still safe and there's still some rump of society for them to be the top echelon of. It took like half the novel for things to really kick, and there's really not much moral complexity in it, and the ending sort of looks like hope, except the world is on fire. It's moderately well-written on most levels--to riff on a line Doctorow riffs on, he wasn't typing with boxing gloves on--but the moral simplicity of it does in the end weigh against it. On the other hand, the novel's point is worth extracting and restating: If people would just do the fucking right thing/s now, we might end up with a world that's not on fire, and wouldn't that be nice?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A Very Simple Crime by Grant Jerkins
This was not a very good novel. One of the narrators is ... not so much an unreliable narrator as just an utter scumball, the other is so ...
-
So, this was a book that I almost stopped reading a couple-three times. It's not *bad*, exactly, but it's a weird dissonant tonal ...
-
My brother-in-law lent this to us, with a strong recommendation, and after enjoying One Last Thing Before I Go greatly, a couple-few year...
-
It's Scalzi being Scalzi. His books are immensely readable--witty and quippy and sparkling and poppy--and this is him, at his Scalzies...

No comments:
Post a Comment