This turned out to be a more complicated novel than James was, at least in some ways. Some of that might have been the explicit intellectualism of the narrator, some might have been the insertion of another (much shorter) novel inside it--one probably too short to play as a novel for real, but enough to serve the larger purposes. The story is ... more nuanced than the cover copy, or reviews of the movie made from it, might lead you to believe. The language is well handled, both in the narrator's own voice (so to speak) and in the thing he writes out of some combination of rage and self-sabotage and desperation and pain; the characters all seem very much themselves, with the exception of the character who's slipping into dementia. The novel has a lot to say about a lot of things, identity (both in the sense of racial and in the sense of self) is the primary one, though there's clearly some amount of poking at the literary establishment of the late-1990s, when this was almost certainly written (publishing date of 2001). It's a pretty strong novel, though I can't pretend to understand the vast majority of what the narrator was writing about when he wasn't, erm, narrating.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dandelion Wine by Ray Bradbury
This is Bradbury writing at his most beautiful, his most nostalgic. It's a paean to his childhood: As the introduction makes clear, th...
-
This is an actual Horror novel. Not a big shock, reading the blurbs, but the jacket text makes it seem vaguely Mystery/Technothriller-ish, a...
-
I dunno. On the one hand there are some interesting ideas in this novel, and Cantero's prose sparkles with wit and joy. On the other h...
-
So, this was a book that I almost stopped reading a couple-three times. It's not *bad*, exactly, but it's a weird dissonant tonal ...

No comments:
Post a Comment